<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: SharePoint 2010 good, Enterprise 2.0 tools may be better</title>
	<atom:link href="http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/cio/sharepoint-2010-good-enterprise-20-tools-may-be-better/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/cio/sharepoint-2010-good-enterprise-20-tools-may-be-better/</link>
	<description>A SearchCIO-Midmarket.com blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 02 Apr 2013 15:16:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: Pankaj2008</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/cio/sharepoint-2010-good-enterprise-20-tools-may-be-better/#comment-111</link>
		<dc:creator>Pankaj2008</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jan 2010 21:30:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/cio/?p=473#comment-111</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The question is simple - why use a clunky, server based, complex, hard to maintain software which will be updated once every two years when you can have a similar solution without any hardware or software, is easy to use, costs way less, and is upgraded on an ongoing basis without any extra cost?  

We shifted from [A href=&quot;http://www.hyperoffice.com/sharepoint-alternative/&quot;]SharePoint to the HyperOffice collaboration suite[/A] a year ago and are more pleased with our decision. Not only is there no hassle of maintaining a solution, teams are in control of their own tools, without having to involve IT at each step.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The question is simple &#8211; why use a clunky, server based, complex, hard to maintain software which will be updated once every two years when you can have a similar solution without any hardware or software, is easy to use, costs way less, and is upgraded on an ongoing basis without any extra cost?  </p>
<p>We shifted from [A href="http://www.hyperoffice.com/sharepoint-alternative/"]SharePoint to the HyperOffice collaboration suite[/A] a year ago and are more pleased with our decision. Not only is there no hassle of maintaining a solution, teams are in control of their own tools, without having to involve IT at each step.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
