 




<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Cisco killed the Flip camera and other surprises</title>
	<atom:link href="http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/cio/cisco-killed-the-flip-camera-and-other-surprises/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/cio/cisco-killed-the-flip-camera-and-other-surprises/</link>
	<description>A SearchCIO-Midmarket.com blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 02 Apr 2013 15:16:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: LLee</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/cio/cisco-killed-the-flip-camera-and-other-surprises/#comment-248</link>
		<dc:creator>LLee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Apr 2011 16:45:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://1651837123#comment-248</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I certainly agree with your post -- and the Cisco side caught me by surprise as well. Rather than just &#039;kill&#039; the product, why not find a buyer, as  you mention?  
Is there another issue behind the death of the Flip?  Flip seems more robust in terms of video recording than smartphones/cells ... 
Why the real reason for the &#039;kill&#039;?  Infringement somewhere, anywhere?  
In this economy, some money as spin-off/sell-off, is much better than no money ..]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I certainly agree with your post &#8212; and the Cisco side caught me by surprise as well. Rather than just &#8216;kill&#8217; the product, why not find a buyer, as  you mention?<br />
Is there another issue behind the death of the Flip?  Flip seems more robust in terms of video recording than smartphones/cells &#8230;<br />
Why the real reason for the &#8216;kill&#8217;?  Infringement somewhere, anywhere?<br />
In this economy, some money as spin-off/sell-off, is much better than no money ..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kengon</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/cio/cisco-killed-the-flip-camera-and-other-surprises/#comment-244</link>
		<dc:creator>Kengon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Apr 2011 23:41:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://1651837123#comment-244</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Your comments are right on the money.
I missed the whole owned by Cisco thing too.
I think that trying to compare the Flip with a smart phone is not a good comparison, as the capabilities and quality are different.
Think that your suggestion for a spin off was a much better idea than killing it.
They had better focus on the enterprise, because if I ever associate them with another consumer product, I will run the other way.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your comments are right on the money.<br />
I missed the whole owned by Cisco thing too.<br />
I think that trying to compare the Flip with a smart phone is not a good comparison, as the capabilities and quality are different.<br />
Think that your suggestion for a spin off was a much better idea than killing it.<br />
They had better focus on the enterprise, because if I ever associate them with another consumer product, I will run the other way.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
