 




<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What &#8216;net new&#8217; kemosabe?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/channel-marker/what-net-new-kemosabe/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/channel-marker/what-net-new-kemosabe/</link>
	<description>A SearchITChannel.com blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 21 Mar 2013 00:31:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: Pat Colbert</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/channel-marker/what-net-new-kemosabe/#comment-662</link>
		<dc:creator>Pat Colbert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Jan 2009 23:09:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://channelmarker.blogs.techtarget.com/2008/11/21/what-net-new-kemosabe/#comment-662</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Clearly software vendors with commodity products, like Symantec and Microsoft, have a difficult time paying upgrade fees when they can automate that action and save the margin.  Companies like Oracle and CA, however, require a tad more hand holding from partners each year to ensure that upgrades work with other applications/ or training on any enhancements that might be included.  I think the price of the upgrade or renewal is probably relative to the work required to support it. 

I believe that Software resellers that don&#039;t add value may be out in the cold if there is no reason to pay them for supporting a product that has no upgrade enhancements.  However, that being said, commodity vendors need to ensure that there is no hidden cost of support - like phone calls from the customer.  

Vendors also need to balance the higher sales cost of selling a commodity product to a new user.  Can a reseller afford to be in that business?  And, is the vendor paying enough?

Those are some of my thoughts.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Clearly software vendors with commodity products, like Symantec and Microsoft, have a difficult time paying upgrade fees when they can automate that action and save the margin.  Companies like Oracle and CA, however, require a tad more hand holding from partners each year to ensure that upgrades work with other applications/ or training on any enhancements that might be included.  I think the price of the upgrade or renewal is probably relative to the work required to support it. </p>
<p>I believe that Software resellers that don&#8217;t add value may be out in the cold if there is no reason to pay them for supporting a product that has no upgrade enhancements.  However, that being said, commodity vendors need to ensure that there is no hidden cost of support &#8211; like phone calls from the customer.  </p>
<p>Vendors also need to balance the higher sales cost of selling a commodity product to a new user.  Can a reseller afford to be in that business?  And, is the vendor paying enough?</p>
<p>Those are some of my thoughts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan Blacharski</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/channel-marker/what-net-new-kemosabe/#comment-661</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan Blacharski</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2008 16:38:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://channelmarker.blogs.techtarget.com/2008/11/21/what-net-new-kemosabe/#comment-661</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I don&#039;t think the jig is up, but as I mentioned in my blog on ITWorld, VARs will be dancing to a different tune. Any business that resists change is doomed to failure. I cite the US auto industry as an example. Resistance to drastic change and a sense of entitlement to the public trough will eventually spell the demise of the US auto industry as a major force. But VARs will be more resilient than the auto industry, simply because they will be forced to change directions, and will survive the recession better than most.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t think the jig is up, but as I mentioned in my blog on ITWorld, VARs will be dancing to a different tune. Any business that resists change is doomed to failure. I cite the US auto industry as an example. Resistance to drastic change and a sense of entitlement to the public trough will eventually spell the demise of the US auto industry as a major force. But VARs will be more resilient than the auto industry, simply because they will be forced to change directions, and will survive the recession better than most.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
