<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Microsoft plots SQL Server 2010</title>
	<atom:link href="http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/channel-marker/microsoft-plots-sql-server-2010/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/channel-marker/microsoft-plots-sql-server-2010/</link>
	<description>A SearchITChannel.com blog</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 05:37:51 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: AMD Talk &#187; Microsoft plots SQL Server 2010</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/channel-marker/microsoft-plots-sql-server-2010/#comment-653</link>
		<dc:creator>AMD Talk &#187; Microsoft plots SQL Server 2010</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Oct 2008 16:25:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://channelmarker.blogs.techtarget.com/2008/10/06/microsoft-plots-sql-server-2010/#comment-653</guid>
		<description>[...] Matt Asay wrote an interesting post today onHere&#8217;s a quick excerptMicrosoft’s database folks say that SQL Server 2010 (yes, that’s the shocking name of the next release) will make it out in the 36-month window the company has prescribed for database releases. In fact, it’s promised for the first half &#8230; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Matt Asay wrote an interesting post today onHere&#8217;s a quick excerptMicrosoft’s database folks say that SQL Server 2010 (yes, that’s the shocking name of the next release) will make it out in the 36-month window the company has prescribed for database releases. In fact, it’s promised for the first half &#8230; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- dynamic -->