<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: ISVs: One stack or two?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/channel-marker/isvs-one-stack-or-two/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/channel-marker/isvs-one-stack-or-two/</link>
	<description>A SearchITChannel.com blog</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 19:02:08 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Microsoft: Friend or bulldozer? &#8212; Channel Marker</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/channel-marker/isvs-one-stack-or-two/#comment-582</link>
		<dc:creator>Microsoft: Friend or bulldozer? &#8212; Channel Marker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 May 2008 21:17:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://channelmarker.blogs.techtarget.com/2008/04/28/isvs-one-stack-or-two/#comment-582</guid>
		<description>[...] Seven: Offer customer choice. Balance the Microsoft integration with the customer&#8217;s need to work outside the stack. &#8220;We&#8217;re into the operating system and core .Net environment and the database, although there are ways around that. But beyond that, our customers can integrate with the Microsoft technologies they want to but don&#8217;t have to. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Seven: Offer customer choice. Balance the Microsoft integration with the customer&#8217;s need to work outside the stack. &#8220;We&#8217;re into the operating system and core .Net environment and the database, although there are ways around that. But beyond that, our customers can integrate with the Microsoft technologies they want to but don&#8217;t have to. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- dynamic -->