<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: IBM-iPhone snafu examined</title>
	<atom:link href="http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/channel-marker/ibm-iphone-snafu-examined/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/channel-marker/ibm-iphone-snafu-examined/</link>
	<description>A SearchITChannel.com blog</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 22:16:23 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Apple &#187; IBM-iPhone snafu examined</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/channel-marker/ibm-iphone-snafu-examined/#comment-515</link>
		<dc:creator>Apple &#187; IBM-iPhone snafu examined</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2008 19:32:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://channelmarker.blogs.techtarget.com/2008/01/22/ibm-iphone-snafu-examined/#comment-515</guid>
		<description>[...] Channel Marker &#226;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Channel Marker &acirc;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: IPhone &#187; IBM-iPhone snafu examined</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/channel-marker/ibm-iphone-snafu-examined/#comment-514</link>
		<dc:creator>IPhone &#187; IBM-iPhone snafu examined</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2008 19:20:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://channelmarker.blogs.techtarget.com/2008/01/22/ibm-iphone-snafu-examined/#comment-514</guid>
		<description>[...] Here&#8217;s another interesting post I read today by Channel Marker [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Here&#8217;s another interesting post I read today by Channel Marker [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: IBM-iPhone snafu examined</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/channel-marker/ibm-iphone-snafu-examined/#comment-513</link>
		<dc:creator>IBM-iPhone snafu examined</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2008 19:15:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://channelmarker.blogs.techtarget.com/2008/01/22/ibm-iphone-snafu-examined/#comment-513</guid>
		<description>[...] unknown wrote an interesting post today onHere&#8217;s a quick excerptIt’s too bad for Domino partners for whom iPhone connectivity might be a much-needed boost. The news was probably very welcome; the retraction of said news not so much. Gartner and other analysts have skewered Apple for not making the &#8230; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] unknown wrote an interesting post today onHere&#8217;s a quick excerptIt’s too bad for Domino partners for whom iPhone connectivity might be a much-needed boost. The news was probably very welcome; the retraction of said news not so much. Gartner and other analysts have skewered Apple for not making the &#8230; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Iphone &#187; Blog Archive &#187; IBM-iPhone snafu examined</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/channel-marker/ibm-iphone-snafu-examined/#comment-512</link>
		<dc:creator>Iphone &#187; Blog Archive &#187; IBM-iPhone snafu examined</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2008 19:12:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://channelmarker.blogs.techtarget.com/2008/01/22/ibm-iphone-snafu-examined/#comment-512</guid>
		<description>[...] Barbara Darrow wrote an interesting post today on IBM-iPhone snafu examinedHere&#8217;s a quick excerptIt’s too bad for Domino partners for whom iPhone connectivity might be a much-needed boost. The news was probably very welcome; the retraction of said news not so much. Gartner and other analysts have skewered Apple for not making the &#8230; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Barbara Darrow wrote an interesting post today on IBM-iPhone snafu examinedHere&#8217;s a quick excerptIt’s too bad for Domino partners for whom iPhone connectivity might be a much-needed boost. The news was probably very welcome; the retraction of said news not so much. Gartner and other analysts have skewered Apple for not making the &#8230; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: iPhone &#187; Blog Archive &#187; IBM-iPhone snafu examined</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/channel-marker/ibm-iphone-snafu-examined/#comment-511</link>
		<dc:creator>iPhone &#187; Blog Archive &#187; IBM-iPhone snafu examined</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2008 19:10:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://channelmarker.blogs.techtarget.com/2008/01/22/ibm-iphone-snafu-examined/#comment-511</guid>
		<description>[...] Read the rest of this great post here [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Read the rest of this great post here [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: IBM-iPhone snafu examined &#124; Technology</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/channel-marker/ibm-iphone-snafu-examined/#comment-510</link>
		<dc:creator>IBM-iPhone snafu examined &#124; Technology</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2008 18:51:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://channelmarker.blogs.techtarget.com/2008/01/22/ibm-iphone-snafu-examined/#comment-510</guid>
		<description>[...] Read the rest of this great post here [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Read the rest of this great post here [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: IBM-iPhone snafu examined</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/channel-marker/ibm-iphone-snafu-examined/#comment-509</link>
		<dc:creator>IBM-iPhone snafu examined</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2008 18:20:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://channelmarker.blogs.techtarget.com/2008/01/22/ibm-iphone-snafu-examined/#comment-509</guid>
		<description>[...] Douglas McIntyre wrote an interesting post today onHere&#8217;s a quick excerptIPhone. Now IBM spokespeeps are backing slooooowly away from the story. The technology isn’t ready, they say. Only problem with that is since when has IBM ever waited for something to be truly ready before announcing it? &#8230; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Douglas McIntyre wrote an interesting post today onHere&#8217;s a quick excerptIPhone. Now IBM spokespeeps are backing slooooowly away from the story. The technology isn’t ready, they say. Only problem with that is since when has IBM ever waited for something to be truly ready before announcing it? &#8230; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: I Organize &#187; Blog Archive &#187; IBM-iPhone snafu examined</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/channel-marker/ibm-iphone-snafu-examined/#comment-508</link>
		<dc:creator>I Organize &#187; Blog Archive &#187; IBM-iPhone snafu examined</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2008 18:17:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://channelmarker.blogs.techtarget.com/2008/01/22/ibm-iphone-snafu-examined/#comment-508</guid>
		<description>[...] Chris Ziegler wrote an interesting post today onHere&#8217;s a quick excerpt [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Chris Ziegler wrote an interesting post today onHere&#8217;s a quick excerpt [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ray Zed Blog &#187; IBM-iPhone snafu examined</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/channel-marker/ibm-iphone-snafu-examined/#comment-507</link>
		<dc:creator>Ray Zed Blog &#187; IBM-iPhone snafu examined</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2008 18:16:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://channelmarker.blogs.techtarget.com/2008/01/22/ibm-iphone-snafu-examined/#comment-507</guid>
		<description>[...] unknown: [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] unknown: [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- dynamic -->