 




<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Business-Technology Weave &#187; workons</title>
	<atom:link href="http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/business-technology/tag/workons/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/business-technology</link>
	<description>Closing divides, directing purpose, and achieving results.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 17:30:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
		<item>
		<title>The WorkWith:  Squeezed in the Middle</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/business-technology/the-workwith-squeezed-in-the-middle/</link>
		<comments>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/business-technology/the-workwith-squeezed-in-the-middle/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 May 2010 19:01:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>David Scott</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[business management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[human resources]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IT Wars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[people management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[workons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[workwiths and workfors]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/business-technology/the-workwith-squeezed-in-the-middle/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As planned, let’s return to our discussion as originally begun on May 7th, Managing People in the Weave.  As necessary, review that post and its follow-ons regarding WorkOns, WorkWiths and WorkFors. I think we all believe that IT professionals have unique challenges within support and betterment of business.  In understanding all of the people around [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 10pt"><span style="font-size: small;font-family: Calibri">As planned, let’s return to our discussion as originally begun on May 7<sup>th</sup>, <em>Managing People in the Weave</em>.<span>  </span>As necessary, review that post and its follow-ons regarding WorkOns, WorkWiths and WorkFors.</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 10pt"><span style="font-size: small;font-family: Calibri">I think we all believe that IT professionals have unique challenges within support and betterment of business.<span>  </span>In understanding all of the people around us, we can come to better interactions.<span>  </span>Better interactions will yield success, promotion and achievement of your career goals – in addition to furtherance of business’s aims and success – no small thing!</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 10pt"><span style="font-size: small;font-family: Calibri">Let’s pick up our discussion by examining the class of employee I call the “WorkWith.”<span>  </span>Remember, this second group is IT’s fellow managers and business staff – co-workers with whom IT has no direct formal control from a management standpoint.  They also comprise middle managers, controllers of business process, and are neither too senior nor too junior.</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 10pt"><span style="font-size: small;font-family: Calibri">The WorkWith group helps to select and plan the future courses of business.<span>  </span>Many WorkWiths will be on the Business Implementation Team (BIT &#8211; see post of Mar. 8)  Here there can be a compounding of risk for change in behavior.<span>  </span>This is because (as with WorkOns) WorkWiths are frequently required to assume greater responsibilities within the scope of their present responsibilities – but the compounding factor is that they also have to manage and direct change.<span>  </span>This group is especially active in the preservation of order amid change, and the preservation of change amid order.<span>  </span>In planning and managing change, those involved have to stick their necks out.<span>  </span>Simultaneously, they have to cover the bases.<span>  </span>WorkWiths have to deal with consequences and are on the hook to <em>report</em> what’s going on and why.<span>  </span>They have to answer for things.</span></p>
<p class="MsoBodyText3" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt"><span style="font-family: &quot;Calibri&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&amp;quot"><span style="font-size: small">Too, the WorkWiths are likely in the middle – situated between the WorkOns and the WorkFors.<span>  </span>There is a special challenge to this group, because they’re not only communicating within the Weave – speaking with special care to Business and Technology – but they also have to communicate up and down the organizational hierarchy.<span>  </span>Theirs is a special balance.<span>  </span>For IT, let’s examine how this person may appear to you when changing groups. </span></span></p>
<p class="MsoBodyText3" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt"><span style="font-family: &quot;Calibri&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&amp;quot"><span style="font-size: small"> </span></span></p>
<p class="MsoBodyText3" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt"><span style="font-family: &quot;Calibri&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&amp;quot"><span style="font-size: small">Essentially, any WorkWith shifts and becomes someone you WorkFor when you’re dealing with him or her as a customer (as does anyone, in any group, for that matter).<span>  </span>Whether you’re updating the WorkWith’s department’s PCs, implementing new software solutions, or addressing general support concerns, you’re working for this person and you have to provide service to their satisfaction.<span>  </span>In these cases, the WorkWith can become demanding, even unreasonable, as the power tilts their way.<span>  </span>They have to <em>get the job done</em> and you have to <em>deliver</em>.<span>  </span>In this case, it helps to understand the pressures a particular WorkWith may be under.<span>  </span><span>  </span></span></span></p>
<p class="MsoBodyText3" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt"><span style="font-family: &quot;Calibri&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&amp;quot"><span style="font-size: small"> </span></span></p>
<p class="MsoBodyText3" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt"><span style="font-family: &quot;Calibri&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&amp;quot"><span style="font-size: small">Next, we’ll examine three kinds of WorkWiths (<em>TechnoShines</em>, <em>TechnoFinds</em> and <em>TechnoBinds</em>) before wrapping up with WorFors.</span></span></p>
<p class="MsoBodyText3" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt"> </p>
<!-- wpms-network-global-inserts -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/business-technology/the-workwith-squeezed-in-the-middle/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
