 




<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Business-Technology Weave &#187; copyright infringement</title>
	<atom:link href="http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/business-technology/tag/copyright-infringement/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/business-technology</link>
	<description>Closing divides, directing purpose, and achieving results.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 18:52:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
		<item>
		<title>Watch that content, Bub&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/business-technology/watch-that-content-bub/</link>
		<comments>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/business-technology/watch-that-content-bub/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Nov 2010 17:42:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>David Scott</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blogging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[COICA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Combating Online Infringement and Counterfeits Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[content]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[copyright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[copyright infringement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[web content]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/business-technology/watch-that-content-bub/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[  Hmmm… word comes that the Senate Judiciary Committee approved a bill that should be of concern to any website, and any content provider:  It would grant the Attorney General the right to shut down offending websites with a court order if copyright infringement is judged to be “central to the activity” of that site. [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> </p>
<p><span style="font-size: small;font-family: Times New Roman">Hmmm… word comes that the Senate Judiciary Committee approved a bill that should be of concern to any website, and any content provider:<span>  </span>It would grant the Attorney General the right to shut down offending websites with a court order if <em>copyright infringement</em> is judged to be “central to the activity” of that site.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: small;font-family: Times New Roman">Of particular concern to me is that the Combating Online Infringement and Counterfeits Act (COICA) seems to be overly broad.<span>  </span>A site need not contain illegal content:<span>  </span>apparently links alone can qualify a site for “shut off.”<span>  </span>I don’t know about you, but I sometimes embed links in some of my articles, as referencing other documents and policies – most if not all protected by copyrights.<span>  </span>It helps to reinforce my content &#8211; that is, what I’m saying &#8211; and with proper acknowledgment, that should be ok.<span>  </span>Ok?<span>  </span>I think it still is… but every bill generally has unintended consequences…</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: small;font-family: Times New Roman">It’s a scary thing in creating a hammer with a very broad head – it just might start smacking the wrong things.<span>  </span>Web censorship is anathema to probably any reader here.<span>  </span>Certainly offended parties can go after entities that are violating copyright… right?<span>  </span>Do we need a huge government bill, granting the AG the power to snap off websites with a simple court order to the ISP?<span>  </span>(Which is how this will be achieved).</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: small;font-family: Times New Roman">I don’t support piracy and illegal activity.<span>  </span>However, I’m not alone in my concerns:<span>  </span>this bill is garnering concern from a number of people and agencies.<span>  </span>You can Google to find more info and what the specific concerns are, but a primary one is that parties that are supposedly in offense of this act have no real <span> </span><em><span style="font-style: normal">opportunity to contest the AG’s allegations for unlawful content</span></em><em>.</em> </span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: small;font-family: Times New Roman">In effect, we’re censoring the web without something extraordinarily important, necessary, and… American:<span>  </span><em>Due process</em>.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: small;font-family: Times New Roman">I’d like to link to a couple articles regarding this, but I dunno…<span>  </span>I’m not sure the present Attorney General is tech-savvy…<span>  </span>maybe I’ll send him a copy of “</span><a href="http://www.amazon.com/I-T-Wars-Managing-Business-Technology-Millennium/dp/1419627635"><span style="font-size: small;font-family: Times New Roman">I.T. WARS</span></a><span style="font-size: small;font-family: Times New Roman">”…<span>  </span>that should help.<span>   </span>:^ )<span>  </span><span>  </span>I think it’s safe to link to my own copyrights…</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: small"><span style="font-family: Times New Roman"><strong>NP</strong>:<span>  </span><strong><em>Hampton – Tatum – Rich</em></strong>, on vinyl, Pablo label; this jazz gem is from an August 1<sup>st</sup>, 1955 session.<span>  </span>Catch it if you possibly can.</span></span></p>
<!-- wpms-network-global-inserts -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/business-technology/watch-that-content-bub/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
