 




<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Business Presentation over your IT &#187; OpenOffice</title>
	<atom:link href="http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/business-presentation/tag/openoffice/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/business-presentation</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 21 Jun 2009 10:21:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
		<item>
		<title>Open Office or Not: Web Friendly Microsoft Office 14 Takes the Stage</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/business-presentation/open-office-or-not-web-friendly-microsoft-office-14-takes-the-stage/</link>
		<comments>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/business-presentation/open-office-or-not-web-friendly-microsoft-office-14-takes-the-stage/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Nov 2008 11:19:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>WPeterson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Google Docs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Office]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Office 14]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Office Live]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online Apps]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OpenOffice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/business-presentation/open-office-or-not-web-friendly-microsoft-office-14-takes-the-stage/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Microsoft has announced that the Service Pack 2 for Office 2007 would be out next spring, but I can&#8217;t find more surprises like the ribbon in first 2007. When I was interested in the recent frenzy of gorgeous Open Office 3.0, Microsoft PDC 2008 (Professional Developers Conference) showed us something new: Office 14 for Web. [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Microsoft has announced that <a href="http://blogs.technet.com/office_sustained_engineering/archive/2008/10/22/announcing-service-pack-2-sp2-for-the-2007-microsoft-office-system.aspx">the Service Pack 2 for Office 2007 would be out next spring</a>, but I can&#8217;t find more surprises like the ribbon in first 2007. When I was interested in <a href="http://www.crn.com/software/211200320">the recent frenzy of gorgeous Open Office 3.0</a>, Microsoft PDC 2008 (Professional Developers Conference) showed us something new: Office 14 for Web. </p>
<p><a href="http://channel9.msdn.com/posts/PDCNews/First-Look-Office-14-for-Web/" title="Office 14 for Web"><img src="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3032/2994283077_493169a886_o.jpg" width="322" height="303" alt="Microsoft Office 14 for Web" border="0" /></a></p>
<p>I can&#8217;t tell this new Web friendly Office will catch the future or not. We see, it&#8217;s really cool, with the immigration to online office trends like <a href="http://docs.google.com/">Google Docs</a>. Definitely Microsoft wants to capture the newly Web market as Google does, and it&#8217;s not a bad idea to start up testing the future software as service. Does this work? We&#8217;ll see how Google makes and wait for the answer. </p>
<p><b>William Peterson<br />
Presentation Veteran</b></p>
<!-- wpms-network-global-inserts -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/business-presentation/open-office-or-not-web-friendly-microsoft-office-14-takes-the-stage/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Do We Really Need Microsoft Office? No in the Past and Future</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/business-presentation/do-we-really-need-microsoft-office-no-in-the-past-and-future/</link>
		<comments>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/business-presentation/do-we-really-need-microsoft-office-no-in-the-past-and-future/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Jul 2008 09:02:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>WPeterson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Business presentations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Corporate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Enterprise]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google Docs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IT professional]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Learning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Office]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online Apps]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OpenOffice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solutions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/business-presentation/do-we-really-need-microsoft-office-no-in-the-past-and-future/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yesterday I read the an article &#8220;Do I Need to Buy Microsoft Office?&#8221; at Ask a Geek of latest Popular Science. As the its result of &#8220;Our geek weighs the options and finds Office might not be the best bet&#8221;, I agree that Microsoft Office&#8217;s rivals are really powerful and nice, such as Google Docs, [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3100/2684948266_b3cb4b9e00_m.jpg" width="240" height="160" alt="Bill Gates with Microsoft Office" /></p>
<p>Yesterday I read the an article &#8220;<a href="http://www.popsci.com/diy/article/2008-06/do-i-need-buy-microsoft-office">Do I Need to Buy Microsoft Office?</a>&#8221; at Ask a Geek of latest Popular Science. As the its result of &#8220;Our geek weighs the options and finds Office might not be the best bet&#8221;, I agree that Microsoft Office&#8217;s rivals are really powerful and nice, such as Google Docs, OpenOffice or Corel&#8217;s WordPerfect Office suite. On my personal side, I would rather choose Google Docs, whether Google would charge me some fees or not in the future. But most businesses nowadays must have the Microsoft Office suite installed, while IBM extremely loves his Lotus Notes software as exception. </p>
<p>In the future, desktop software will be completely replaced with Web applications without doubts. So Microsoft Office is certainly the product for current days. But we can not rush to the future without it because of its popularity in the past. Because a lot of people are working with it now, and will work with it in the future for a long time. In order to avoid any bad incompatibility, our business must have and manage it. Just think about, you partner sent you a document in DOCX format, but you cannot read the contents properly with your OpenOffice, and you will ask for another PDF copy? That&#8217;s also why a huge enterprise IBM can not abandon its ever popurlar used Lotus Notes easily. </p>
<p><b>William Peterson<br />
Presentation Veteran</b></p>
<!-- wpms-network-global-inserts -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/business-presentation/do-we-really-need-microsoft-office-no-in-the-past-and-future/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Gonna Catch Up: OpenOffice.org 2.4 Release Candidate</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/business-presentation/gonna-catch-up-openofficeorg-24-release-candidate/</link>
		<comments>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/business-presentation/gonna-catch-up-openofficeorg-24-release-candidate/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Mar 2008 11:54:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>WPeterson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business presentations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Channel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Enterprise]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Office]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OpenOffice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PowerPoint]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Review]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/business-presentation/gonna-catch-up-openofficeorg-24-release-candidate/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The open-source office application suite, a free alternative to Microsoft&#8217;s ubiquitous Office, is nearing final release on version 2.4. With OpenOffice.org on track to launch version 3.0 later this year. OpenOffice.org continues to evolve. As practice makes perfect, in the coming version, its interface continues to develop into almost a twin of MS-Office&#8217;s pre-ribbon interface. [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The open-source office application suite, a free alternative to Microsoft&#8217;s ubiquitous Office, is nearing final release on version 2.4. With <a href="http://www.openoffice.org">OpenOffice.org</a> on track to launch version 3.0 later this year. OpenOffice.org continues to evolve. As practice makes perfect, in the coming version, its interface continues to develop into almost a twin of MS-Office&#8217;s pre-ribbon interface. </p>
<p>About the Office PowerPoint&#8217;s competitor Impress, there&#8217;s no problems opening a presentation created in Power Point 2007; and slide transitions applied in PowerPoint also carried over in Impress. The slideshow was editable in Impress as well. It seems that OpenOffice has added more animations options as slide transitions. </p>
<p>It&#8217;s great that OpenOffice is compatible with MS Office, but Microsoft Office file formats are not native to it. Everyone thinks that OpenOffice has to be an exact MS Office clone. That&#8217;s not the case, and OpenOffice has a lot of features that Microsoft Office doesn&#8217;t, like the way it integrates with Mysql to perform advanced variable stream data features for printing. </p>
<p>Whether corporates want to direct clients towards OpenOffice as a software solution depends on a variety of factors: budget, client&#8217;s dependence on complex spreadsheet processes and macros and the interoperability of OpenOffice with UC platforms and email and messaging systems. Certainly, OpenOffice could be a good choice, and it&#8217;s always good for further development by yourself, not just under the Microsoft&#8217;s construction. </p>
<p><b>William Peterson<br />
Presentation Veteran</b></p>
<!-- wpms-network-global-inserts -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/business-presentation/gonna-catch-up-openofficeorg-24-release-candidate/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
