<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Behind the times</title>
	<atom:link href="http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/brien-posey/behind-the-times/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/brien-posey/behind-the-times/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 15:14:29 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: JennyMack</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/brien-posey/behind-the-times/#comment-18</link>
		<dc:creator>JennyMack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2009 19:56:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/brien-posey/behind-the-times/#comment-18</guid>
		<description>I have seen a handful of people I know still using Windows 98 and 2000.... if they see no immediate reason to change, they won't. Usually this issue of "antiquated" operating systems is resolved by "force" -- when a computer dies, the new one comes with updated software. Other than that, in their minds, it's often "If it ain't broke, don't fix it."</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have seen a handful of people I know still using Windows 98 and 2000&#8230;. if they see no immediate reason to change, they won&#8217;t. Usually this issue of &#8220;antiquated&#8221; operating systems is resolved by &#8220;force&#8221; &#8212; when a computer dies, the new one comes with updated software. Other than that, in their minds, it&#8217;s often &#8220;If it ain&#8217;t broke, don&#8217;t fix it.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- dynamic -->