Comments on: You can not explain away bad Microsoft behavior! http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/Lotus-administration/you-can-not-explain-away-bad-microsoft-behavior/ David Vasta on all things Lotus, Lotus Admin and Collaboration Mon, 15 Oct 2012 09:59:15 +0000 hourly 1 By: The IT Blog Top 10: November 11, 2010 - ITKE Community Blog http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/Lotus-administration/you-can-not-explain-away-bad-microsoft-behavior/#comment-30 The IT Blog Top 10: November 11, 2010 - ITKE Community Blog Thu, 11 Nov 2010 06:47:27 +0000 http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/Lotus-administration/you-can-not-explain-away-bad-microsoft-behavior/#comment-30 [...] 5. Get your weekly dose of Software Quality Insights from Matt Heusser: Kent Beck on release schedules. 6. It’s Lotus against Microsoft and try as he might, David Vasta can’t explain away bad Microsoft behavior! [...]

]]> By: David Vasta http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/Lotus-administration/you-can-not-explain-away-bad-microsoft-behavior/#comment-29 David Vasta Tue, 09 Nov 2010 23:14:28 +0000 http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/Lotus-administration/you-can-not-explain-away-bad-microsoft-behavior/#comment-29 I have heard the same thing about Solid State was well. I don’t see hardware getting that old as fast as it used to in the 90s and early 2000s, but I could be wrong.

I also don’t understand much of what the person from Microsoft is talking about when it comes to the rip-and-replace Exchange. I know the platform and now work on Lotus out of wanting to keep my full head of hair.

]]> By: Majorking http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/Lotus-administration/you-can-not-explain-away-bad-microsoft-behavior/#comment-28 Majorking Tue, 09 Nov 2010 16:41:26 +0000 http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/Lotus-administration/you-can-not-explain-away-bad-microsoft-behavior/#comment-28 Although I was talking to someone who went with solid state drives and won’t stay there because they have a finite number of writes before they just fail. Talk about planned obsolescence!

]]>