 




<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Lotus Alive: Lotus Administration for Everyone &#187; FUD</title>
	<atom:link href="http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/Lotus-administration/tag/fud/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/Lotus-administration</link>
	<description>David Vasta on all things Lotus, Lotus Admin and Collaboration</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2013 04:00:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
		<item>
		<title>Ed Brill &#8211; Not a good day for the &#8220;other guys&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/Lotus-administration/ed-brill-not-a-good-day-for-the-other-guys/</link>
		<comments>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/Lotus-administration/ed-brill-not-a-good-day-for-the-other-guys/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Sep 2010 13:34:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>David Vasta</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Ed Brill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FUD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IBM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lotus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PC Magazine]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/Lotus-administration/ed-brill-not-a-good-day-for-the-other-guys/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ed has been on a roll lately. The competition seems to always have the upper hand as they deal in FUD, where Lotus and IBM don&#8217;t seem to play those games. Much like in the work of politics the person who throws the most mud gets the most exposure. With that said PCMagazine puts it [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ed has been on a roll lately. The competition seems to always have the upper hand as they deal in FUD, where Lotus and IBM don&#8217;t seem to play those games. Much like in the work of politics the person who throws the most mud gets the most exposure.</p>
<p>With that said PCMagazine puts it out there and Ed just makes it easy to read. Thanks for the great post Ed!</p>
<p>LINK ::<a title="Not a good day for the competition" rel="bookmark" href="http://www.edbrill.com/ebrill/edbrill.nsf/dx/not-a-good-day-for-the-competition">Not a good day for the competition</a></p>
<p>Again if you are using Microsoft Products, it&#8217;s not if you get hit, it&#8217;s when will you get hit. I was an Exchange Admin for a period of time and I hated it. Not the product as much as the constant emergencies while we tried to keep it up and running.</p>
<!-- wpms-network-global-inserts -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/Lotus-administration/ed-brill-not-a-good-day-for-the-other-guys/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
