 




<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Irregular Expressions &#187; airgap network</title>
	<atom:link href="http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/Irregular-Expressions/tag/airgap-network/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/Irregular-Expressions</link>
	<description>Insight into current security related events and exploits, including virtualization security and tips.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 28 Apr 2013 08:00:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
		<item>
		<title>Japan cyber attack</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/Irregular-Expressions/japan-cyber-attack/</link>
		<comments>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/Irregular-Expressions/japan-cyber-attack/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Oct 2011 20:51:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dan O'Connor</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[airgap network]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[japan email hack]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/Irregular-Expressions/japan-cyber-attack/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hackers have targeted the lower house of parliament and Mitsubishi Heavy Industries (Japans largest def contractor).  It appears that they had access to the lower parliament for an extended period of time. http://www.reuters.com/article/2011/10/26/us-japan-economy-hackers-idUSTRE79P2VK20111026 These kind of attacks makes me thing we need a different approach to network security for sensitive locations.  Do we need an internet 3, [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hackers have targeted the lower house of parliament and Mitsubishi Heavy Industries (Japans largest def contractor).  It appears that they had access to the lower parliament for an extended period of time.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/2011/10/26/us-japan-economy-hackers-idUSTRE79P2VK20111026">http://www.reuters.com/article/2011/10/26/us-japan-economy-hackers-idUSTRE79P2VK20111026</a></p>
<p>These kind of attacks makes me thing we need a different approach to network security for sensitive locations.  Do we need an internet 3, for just trusted hosts? Or maybe be more selective on what machines need to be connected to the wide world and what does not.  In reality you can&#8217;t hack what you can&#8217;t get to.  If they had a small email system with maybe some sort of BlackBerry system, that could only send out mail to internal users?</p>
<p>Just a rough thought.</p>
<!-- wpms-network-global-inserts -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/Irregular-Expressions/japan-cyber-attack/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>US Cyber Attack</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/Irregular-Expressions/us-cyber-attack/</link>
		<comments>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/Irregular-Expressions/us-cyber-attack/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Oct 2011 02:39:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dan O'Connor</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[airgap network]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[us libya cyber attack]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/Irregular-Expressions/us-cyber-attack/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I found it. http://news.cnet.com/8301-27080_3-20121681-245/u.s-rejected-cyberattack-on-libya-report-says/ This is also something that will happen soon, and I am not sure it if will be the US on the sending or receiving end.  Critical systems should be on air gap networks, completely cut off no USB keys, laptops, no no no.  Updating may be necessary but that risk needs [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I found it.</p>
<p>http://news.cnet.com/8301-27080_3-20121681-245/u.s-rejected-cyberattack-on-libya-report-says/</p>
<p>This is also something that will happen soon, and I am not sure it if will be the US on the sending or receiving end.  Critical systems should be on air gap networks, completely cut off no USB keys, laptops, no no no.  Updating may be necessary but that risk needs to be tightly managed.</p>
<!-- wpms-network-global-inserts -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/Irregular-Expressions/us-cyber-attack/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
