 




<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Enterprise IT Watch Blog &#187; IPv6</title>
	<atom:link href="http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/IT-watch-blog/tag/ipv6/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/IT-watch-blog</link>
	<description>What's new and what matters in IT news, opinion and analysis.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 13:27:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
		<item>
		<title>Five tips from the Marine Corps IPv6 Transition Strategy</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/IT-watch-blog/five-tips-from-the-us-marine-corps-for-a-victorious-ipv6-transition/</link>
		<comments>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/IT-watch-blog/five-tips-from-the-us-marine-corps-for-a-victorious-ipv6-transition/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Dec 2011 16:04:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael Morisy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IPv6]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Networking]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/IT-watch-blog/?p=3691</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[About a year ago, I got a peek at parts of the Marine Corps&#8217; declassified Intranet, and one of the things that caught my eye was a link to the branch&#8217;s IPv6 Transition plan: With so many companies, from small offices to international telecoms, struggling with the switch, how do the Marines go about it? [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignright size-full wp-image-3696" src="http://cdn.ttgtmedia.com/ITKE/uploads/blogs.dir/141/files/2011/12/usmc.png" alt="" width="135" height="137" />About a year ago, I got a peek at parts of the Marine Corps&#8217; declassified Intranet, and one of the things that caught my eye was a link to the branch&#8217;s IPv6 Transition plan: With so many companies, from small offices to international telecoms, struggling with the switch, how do the Marines go about it? And what could the rest of us learn?</p>
<p>A lot. The Marines, and in fact the entire Department of Defense, were mandated early adopters of IPv6, citing security and operational requirements. They had targeted FY 2008 as the final IPv6 transition date, with the transition plan going dated for 2004.</p>
<p><span id="more-3691"></span></p>
<p>So I <a href="http://www.muckrock.com/foi/view/united-states-of-america/marine-corps-ipv6-transition-plan/155/">filed a Freedom of Information request</a> for the full transition plan, and eight months later I got my response, embedded here:</p>
<p><span><div id="viewer-270970-united-states-marine-corps-internet-protocol"></div>
<script src="http://s3.documentcloud.org/viewer/loader.js"></script>
<script>
DV.load("http://www.documentcloud.org/documents/270970-united-states-marine-corps-internet-protocol.js", {
  width: 627,
  height: 600,
  sidebar: false,
  container: "#viewer-270970-united-states-marine-corps-internet-protocol"});
</script></span></p>
<p>The 38-page transition plan details, at a high level, all the steps the Marines took to ensure a smooth, cost effective switch to IPv6 while ensuring backwards compatibility, and there&#8217;s a lot of great case study material in there, especially if you&#8217;ve been pushing off your own switch.</p>
<ul>
<li><strong>Start upgrading without disruption. </strong>One of the first steps the Marine Corps took was mandating that all equipment bought after October 1, 2003 be both IPv4 and IPv6 capable, ensuring that there wouldn&#8217;t be sudden end-of-lifing of relatively new equipment due to IPv6 incompatability.</li>
<li><strong>Plenty of lead time.</strong> In 2004, when the guide was drafted, IPv4 address exhaustion was a seemingly distant possibility. Now, it&#8217;s an impending reality. By planning far ahead, many changes could be incremental rather than wholesale.</li>
<li><strong>Trust but verify. </strong>Section 2-2 of the transition plan outlines various definitions. IPv6 capable devices, for example, means it is IPv6 ready today, as well as maintains IPv4 interopability. IPv6 enabled, however, means that the vendor states it is IPv6 ready today &#8230; but it hasn&#8217;t been tested internally yet. Internal testing of those claims is the key differentiator between capable and enabled, and often between a smooth transition and months of headaches and overruns.</li>
<li><strong>Failure IS an option.</strong> When it&#8217;s controlled, at least. The Marines created a &#8220;waiver&#8221; program that took into consideration edge cases. By adapting to situations where IPv6 targets couldn&#8217;t be met, it&#8217;s possible to keep track of what didn&#8217;t work out, why and plan for when it can be remedied.</li>
<li><strong>Forms makes process.</strong> The Marines also put together a number of forms for each department to follow, worksheets to help managers, for whom IPv6 probably isn&#8217;t a top priority, make sure they were aware of key considerations and could stay on target without major distraction.</li>
</ul>
<div>Speaking of forms, along with my release, the<a href="http://www.muckrock.com/foi/view/united-states-of-america/marine-corps-ipv6-transition-plan/155/"> FOIA request netted a number of useful appendices</a> that include IPv6 readiness worksheets like transition surveys, an assessment guide and more.</div>
<div>One big lingering question I had, however, was how did the transition, scheduled for completion three years ago, actually go? Is the Department of Defense now 100% IPv6 ready? I couldn&#8217;t find any news results to indicate either way, so it looks like it&#8217;s time to file another FOIA request &#8230;</div>
<div><span><em>Michael Morisy is the editorial director for ITKnowledgeExchange. <a href="http://www.twitter.com/morisy" target="_blank">Followed him on Twitter</a> or reach him at <a href="mailto:Michael@ITKnowledgeExchange.com" target="_blank">Michael@ITKnowledgeExchange.com</a>.</em></span></div>
<!-- wpms-network-global-inserts -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/IT-watch-blog/five-tips-from-the-us-marine-corps-for-a-victorious-ipv6-transition/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Are you ready for World IPv6 Day?</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/IT-watch-blog/are-you-ready-for-world-ipv6-day/</link>
		<comments>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/IT-watch-blog/are-you-ready-for-world-ipv6-day/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 May 2011 19:10:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>MelanieYarbrough</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[IPv4]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IPv6]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Networking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[World IPv6 Day]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/IT-watch-blog/?p=3160</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Since IPv4 addresses have slowly but surely begun to run out, the Internet Society has arranged a day to test out the future, or IPv6 at least: June 8, 2011. With the air of someone foretelling the apocalypse, IPv6 advocates strongly urge users and to join the revolution and leave IPv4 behind. On the brink [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Since IPv4 addresses have slowly but surely begun to run out, the <a href="http://isoc.org/wp/worldipv6day/" target="_blank">Internet Society</a> has arranged a day to test out the future, or IPv6 at least: June 8, 2011. With the air of someone foretelling the apocalypse, IPv6 advocates strongly urge users and to join the revolution and leave IPv4 behind. On the brink of its fortieth birthday, IPv4 is about to max out on the number of unique connections and devices it can safely track. Many companies have jumped on board World IPv6 Day in order to test and demonstrate the decreased hassle of adopting the newest IP version. Major organizations such as Cisco, Bing, Rackspace, Google, Yahoo!, Facebook, and Juniper Networks have signed on to participate in the worldwide test, offering their content over IPv6 for 24 hours (although some companies already offer such access, 24/7).</p>
<p>But <a href="http://www.networkworld.com/news/2011/052311-ipv6-fail.html?hpg1=bn" target="_blank">big name supporters don&#8217;t have everyone convinced</a> that this is the beginning of the IPv6 revolution. As the VP of IP engineering at NTT America, Dorian Kim, told Carolyn Marsan, the Internet &#8220;will be even more heavily NATed than it currently is, but life will mostly go on.&#8221; On the contrary, chairman of the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) Russ Housley fears a &#8220;very fragile Internet&#8221; will result if increased network address translation, as necessitated with IPv4, becomes the case.</p>
<p><strong>A Short History of IPv6</strong></p>
<p>Created by the Internet Engineering Task Force in 1998, IPv6&#8242;s primary purpose is to expand the Internet&#8217;s address space while adding autoconfiguration, network renumbering, and security through the IPsec protocol. The push for IPv6 adoption has included support from Google, Verizon, Comcast, and especially the U.S. government with its 2008 mandate that all agency networks to demonstrate the capability to carry IPv6 traffic. In July 2010, the Federal Acquisition Regulation changed, requiring government agencies to purchase only IPv6-capable systems.</p>
<p>Whether or not the public is ready, IPv4 addresses will almost certainly run out in the next few years (In fact, Asia&#8217;s registry, APNIC, <a href="http://www.zdnet.com/blog/networking/it-8217s-official-asia-8217s-just-run-out-of-ipv4-addresses/948">has already depleted its normal reserves</a>). Perhaps that&#8217;s what the Mayans meant with their 2012 warnings?</p>
<p><strong>Beating Around the IPv6</strong></p>
<p>If you&#8217;re struggling with the question of <a href="http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/enterprise-IT-tech-trends/ipv6-to-deploy-or-not-to-deploy/" target="_blank">whether or not to deploy IPv6</a>, there are several options to make transitioning from IPv4 to IPv6 easier, such as dual stacking, or running both protocols simultaneously in your network. Network address translation allows the sharing of one public IPv4 address across several users. But users are urged to not stop there. Tools such as OpenDNS&#8217;s <a href="http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/wans/opendns-launches-ipv6-sandbox-for-network-pros-to-play-in/" target="_blank">IPv6 Sandbox</a> allow networking professionals to get their feet wet, starting a full month before World IPv6 Day.</p>
<p>To check if your devices are ready for World IPv6 Day, visit <a href="http://test-ipv6.com/">http://test-ipv6.com/</a> before June 8, and for troubleshooting info, visit the <a href="http://www.getipv6.info/index.php/Customer_problems_that_could_occur" target="_blank">American Registry for Internet Numbers</a> (ARIN). Be sure to check with your devices&#8217; manufacturers about upgrading operating systems, browsers, and router software to ensure you are ready to test out IPv6.</p>
<p>What&#8217;s keeping you from taking the plunge? Let us know in the comments section or send me an email at <a href="mailto:melanie@itknowledgeexchange.com" target="_blank">Melanie@ITKnowledgeExchange.com</a>.</p>
<!-- wpms-network-global-inserts -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/IT-watch-blog/are-you-ready-for-world-ipv6-day/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
