Has the solution to the “Windows 7: To VDI or not to VDI” dilemma finally arrived? Suddenly Microsoft’s July extension of VDI use rights as part of their Software Assurance licensing benefits comes into focus. With the release of Windows Thin PC, or WinTPC, Microsoft simplifies the debate for users already enrolled in the Software Assure Program.
Whereas other users have to pay an extra cost for Windows Virtual Desktop Access subscriptions to use thin-client devices, future users of WinTPC won’t have to buy a VDA license, as explained by Gavriella Schuster, General Manager for the Windows Commercial business, in the Windows Team blog:
WinTPC is a smaller footprint, locked down version of Windows 7, designed to allow customers to repurpose their existing PCs as thin clients. PCs with WinTPC will not require the VDA license that regular thin clients will need to access VDI desktops. WinTPC is expected to be available for download from the Microsoft Connect Site in Q1 2011.
This benefit approach is Microsoft’s way of helping companies maximize technology investments by lowering or eliminating the up-front costs of thin clients to be used for VDI as well as the cost of licensing. Another concern for Microsoft, as outlined by Karri Alexion-Tiernan in a blog post, is to address the shrinking budgets for new devices. Allowing customers to utilize existing PCs frees up some of that budget to be spent “towards devices that offer more functionality and flexibility, such as new Windows 7 PCs, tablets, or slates.” While there is much skepticism from the experts, WinTPC is nonetheless slated to be released this month. More announcements are to be made tomorrow, so we’ll update you on any news.
Is Microsoft going to be too late to the tablet party?
While the iPad infiltrated the consumer market before sneaking its way into the enterprise – to many people’s chagrin and still only with a sliver of enterprise users – perhaps Microsoft is taking the backwards approach: Enter the enterprise market with Windows-equipped tablets after the market is full-fledged and saturated. Hey, it worked with their mobile timeline, right?
What do you think of WinTPC? Not impressed by Microsoft’s unending attempts to lock users in? Let us know in the comments section or send me an email at Melanie@ITKnowledgeExchange.com.
With enterprise IT’s evolution comes the evolution of its operating system of choice, which for many is some flavor of Windows. Since Windows 7’s release, there has been some hesitation to migrate across the board, with many companies still holding on dearly to Windows XP. It seems that those who have made the jump, or stuck their toes in the Windows 7 water, are pretty satisfied with the outcome. We polled some IT Knowledge Exchange members, and got some glowing reviews.
With last week’s release of Service Pack 1 for Windows 7 and Server 2008 R2, you may be experiencing some hesitation or caution when approaching the installation of this major update. As Ed Bott has observed, there have been no major issues reported by those who have taken the leap and installed SP1.
If you’re still in testing mode, however, he recommends using the SP1 Blocker toolkit from Microsoft to prevent the service pack’s delivery via Windows Updates. He also has some good advice for those ready to install the new package, or really any new major update:
- Create a manual system restore point to return to in case of a problem.
- Perform a manual image backup of your system prior to installation.
Michael Morisy recently talked about the plethora of Windows options available on the market right now. One man took it a step further, and took a walk down Windows memory lane. Whether you’re planning a company roll out of Windows 7, or you’re considering the installation of SP1, take a minute (or ten) to go back to your roots:
[kml_flashembed movie="http://www.youtube.com/v/vPnehDhGa14" width="425" height="350" wmode="transparent" /]
For additional questions or concerns regarding the update, check out Microsoft’s TechNet Forums for user reactions and threads. Have other concerns or questions? Take advantage of the ITKnowledgeExchange community and visit the Forums, post in the comments section, or contact me directly at Melanie@ITKnowledgeExchange.com.
It seems like just yesterday we were celebrating Windows 7’s birthday, and now we’re being told to start etching a more sobering date in stone:
April 8, 2014: The Day Windows XP Dies
Service Packs 1 and 1a were retired back in 2006. Service Pack 2 rode off into the sunset last month, on July 13. And Service Pack 3 will be retired along with all editions of Windows XP on Patch Tuesday, April 8, 2014.
It’s true that this date has been pushed back twice, but this might be the actual end of the line, as both Eds point out, that at this juncture, Microsoft will almost certainly be handling at least 4 generations of Windows. The SKU count (i.e., the available flavors of Windows) enters dangerous territory:
- XP has Home, Professional, Starter, Media Center and Tablet Edition, as well as the 64-bit editions.
- Vista has Starter, Home Basic, Home Premium, Vista Business, Vista Enterprise and Vista Ultimate.
- Windows 7 has Starter, Home Basic, Home Premium, Professional, Enterprise, Ultimate, and Thin.
I’ve harped on this a lot in the past, but in a bid to maximize profits, Microsoft has littered the market with far too many Windows product versions, or what the company calls SKUs (for “stock keeping unit,” retailing term). And while we can try to dumb down the conversation by explaining how, in any given market, customers only have two or three or four choices, or whatever, the fact remains: One version is not just enough, it’s optimal from the customer point of view. Just ask Apple: It offers just one version of Mac OS X. It’s called Mac OS X. Not Mac OS X Media Center Edition or Mac OS X Arbitrarily Limited Edition. Just Mac OS.
Start-ups are raising venture capital everywhere we look. Here are some of the most promising of the start-ups providing storage as a service that are well on their way to being a force to reckon with.
The San Fransisco-based storage-as-a-service provider has raised $7 million in its second round of venture funding, totaling $13 million to date. The company announced plans to open a New York office to expand its sales and services to the East Coast as well as improving its “distributed object-based storage platform, adding full multi-tenancy for Service Providers who want to offer Virtual Private Clouds, and new tiering algorithm for the Private clouds environments.”
Its major accomplishment so far is doubling its funding in May 2010 after successfully delivering an email platform to Telenet’s over 2 million users.
The Silicon Valley-based file storage and sync provider has raised $10 million in its second series of funding, totaling $16 million to date. Often compared to Dropbox, Egnyte’s service utilizes a hybrid cloud solution that is geared toward SMBs. The client links a network-attached storage device to its office computers, constituting the local cloud where all files are synced and backed up. The local cloud is then linked to Egnyte’s servers for a remote access-enabled web backup. Clients are given security permission layers and have control over file sharing administration.
Egnyte experienced a quadrupling of its customer base in 2010, and boasts over 500,000 user licenses and 5 billion files synced. Its claim to beating Box.net in large data upload speed is backed by its average of 3,000 file uploads and downloads per minute. Egnyte’s plans for its most recent funding is to expand to international markets while increasing domestic sales, marketing and engineering. Look out for their logo in the enterprise application section of the next version of the iPad’s app store.
Despite Egnyte’s claims to speeding by Box.net’s capabilities, this Palo Alto-based online file storage and collaboration software provider takes the cake with its $48 million in its fourth round of funding. Rather than Dropbox, Box.net gets compared to a certain social networking site because of its young founders, which may serve as its greatest asset. As Box’s Chief Executive Aaron Levie told the Wall Street Journal, big vendors such as “Microsoft are just not innovating fast enough,” which in turn “create[s] huge…opportunities for guys like Box.” The company plans to double its 140-person staff within the next year, expand to international markets and step up their game in mobile applications. Good thing, too, since it’s servicing 5 million users at 60,000 companies, 73 % of which are in the Fortune 500, including Cisco and Panasonic.
Where is your company looking for its cloud storage and backup solutions? Are startups meeting the needs of small, medium, and big enterprises alike, or is there something left to be desired at the moment? Share your thoughts and experiences in the comments section or send me an email at Melanie@ITKnowledgeExchange.com.
Now that we’ve wrapped up cloud security, it’s time to look at what we can do with that secured cloud and there’s one roaring hot area we haven’t touched on much: Cloud storage, aka storage as a service. Consumer cloud storage has been taking off, and as we’ve seen in the mobile device and Software-as-a-Service (SaaS) worlds, where the consumers go, business is sure to follow.
Already, we’re seeing one company that might be gearing up to be a contender: Box.net, which recently received funding totaling about $80 million, is being compared to an early Facebook in terms of potential. A better comparison, however, might be SaaS, and now Platform-as-a-Service, juggernaut Salesforce.com.
In 5 years, that company took an admittedly all-star pedigree (Box.net’s founders are 20-something young guns, hence the Facebook comparisons) to IPO for $100 million, with a current market capitalization of $17 billion. Now that’s cool, and this business-centric territory seems to be where Box is aiming, unlike consumer services Mozbe and Dropbox. As the Seattle Times reports:
Box’s focus on the enterprise market makes it seem more mundane than some of the other investments that Andreessen Horowitz has made in more widely used Internet services — a group that, besides Facebook, includes Twitter, Zynga, Skype and Groupon. It also means there probably won’t be any Oscar-nominated movies made about Box, as Zuckerberg got with “The Social Network,” and Levie seems unlikely to be named Time magazine’s person of the year, as Zuckerberg was last year.
But that doesn’t mean Box can’t deliver a huge windfall for its investors, said John O’Farrell, a general partner at Andreessen Horowitz. “Enterprise software is a less sexy space, but that has created a huge opportunity for investors like us,” O’Farrell said.
There are, of course, a number of other options, ranging from simple off-site backup plans that run nightly to a bevy of managed services to help both simplify storage while still offering a high degree of control. One thing is certain, however: When it comes to storage, the future is cloudy.
There’s always more to learn, especially in IT, but we’ve done our best to clear up some of the confusion and anxiety around security in the cloud. Take a walk down memory lane with us as we recap the month’s highlights and guides from around the community.
- ITKnowledgeExchange community members cast their votes for favorite security blogs, and they’re worth a look.
- You didn’t have to attend this year’s RSA Conference to be able to appreciate the wisdom packed into some of these security professionals’ Twitter accounts.
- Whether you’re curious about cloud security or just plain lost, check out our Cloud Security Recommended Reading List for a jumping off point. Feel free to add your own picks and reviews!
Editorial Director Michael Morisy flew to hazy San Fransisco for RSA 2011. Check out some of his highlights:
- Oracle Database Firewall: A Babel Fish for SQL Sleazeballs
- At RSA 2011, Hacktivism is (again) a corporate threat
- The sneaky vulnerability that beat Coca-Cola’s HDD encryption and leaked the secret recipe
- Meet Rivest, Shamir and Adleman: The men behind RSA
- 5 takeaways from the Department of Defense’s Cyber Strategy 3.0
- Did iPhones make the desktop virtualization call easier?
Michael wasn’t the only one from our neck of the woods at the conference, so check out some other great blog posts from the West Coast festivities:
- RSA 2011: Does compliance inhibit security innovation?
- RSA 2011: Dan Kaminsky on the ROI of DNSSEC for enterprises
- Defense secretary outlines Pentagon cyber strategy
Open IT Forum
We’re never in want of a good discussion around ITKnowledgeExchange. Get to know your community by checking out members’ thoughts on some cloud security issues:
- Security Worst-Cases: Spadasoe, Fork92, Mpez0, CharlieBrowne, and Batye spill the beans on their firsthand experiences with security gone awry.
- What cloud concern do you need addressed?: Yeomanie, Sixball, and Ad2 share their reservations regarding cloud solutions.
- What are your cloud security concerns for 2011?: Batye, MicroAcres, and Rechil expressed concern about understanding normal processes such as backups and security in relation to the new technology.
Just because cloud security month has come to an end doesn’t mean that we’re not still dedicated to providing you with the know-how and necessary tools to navigate cloud computing. Keep posting those questions and discussions to forums and tagging them Cloud Security.
Think you can secure your virtual machines with the security you have in place? Today’s guest post comes from David Strom, and he warns you to think again.
The protective technologies that are plentiful and commonplace in the physical world become few and far between when it comes to the cloud. And while few attacks have been observed in the wild that specifically target VMs, this doesn’t mean you shouldn’t protect them.
So why can’t you just use a regular firewall and intrusion prevention appliance to protect your cloud? Several reasons. First, traditional firewalls aren’t designed to inspect and filter the vast amount of traffic originating from a hypervisor running ten virtualized servers. Second, VMs are so easily portable that tracking down a particular instance isn’t always something that a traditional IDS can do. Third, because VMs can start, stop, and move from hypervisor to hypervisor at the click of a button, protective features have to be able to handle and recognize these movements and activities with ease. Finally, few hypervisors have the access controls that even the most basic file server has: Once someone can gain access to the hypervisor, they can start, stop, and modify all of the VMs that are housed there.
There are a growing number of vendors and products in this space. Over the past year, the pace of mergers and acquisitions has picked up as the major virtualization and security vendors try to augment their offerings and integrate products.
- VMware purchased Blue Lane Technologies and incorporated their software into its vShield product line.
- Juniper Networks purchased Altor Networks Virtual Firewall and is in the process of integrating it into its line of firewalls and management software.
- Third Brigade is now part of Trend Micro’s Deep Security line.
There are other vendors, as well, in this space:
- Beyond Trust Power Broker Servers for Virtualization
- CA’s Virtual Privilege Manager
- Catbird vSecurity
- Fortinet FortiWeb VM
- Hytrust Appliance
- Reflex Systems Virtualization Management Center
Sadly, no single product can cover the typical security features found in most corporate data centers: Firewalls, IDS, anti-virus/anti-spam, and access controls. Some products have different modules for each of these functions (like Reflex and Trend) while some specialize in particular areas (such as Hytrust for access controls and compliance). All of these products cover VMware servers, but none of them protect Microsoft’s HyperV installations. A few (such as Catbird and BeyondTrust) will also protect Xen hypervisors.
Finally, if you get involved in testing these products, be prepared to spend some time understanding how they insert themselves into your cloud-based infrastructure. Hytrust, for example, looks like a load balancing appliance in that it segregates your virtual network segments. Others, such as Reflex or Catbird, require agents to be installed directly on the ESX host itself.
David Strom has many interests: as a former IT manager, a publication editor, a Web site creator, a podcaster and video producer, and a professional speaker. He writes several blogs including strominator.com, webinformant.tv, and mediablather.com. He lives in St. Louis and can be found on twitter @dstrom.
Last week, I spoke to Salesforce.com’s head of platform research, Peter Coffee, about how the attitude toward cloud computing needs to change. But is this “shake off your fears” method exclusive only to big business? Ralph Plunkett, MIS Operations Manager at Electronics Research, Inc., a broadcast services and products provider, thinks so. Beyond that, he doesn’t think SMBs are being included in the talk about cloud adoption, nor are their issues being covered or addressed.
“Smaller shops don’t have the budget that bigger shops do,” Plunkett said. “One thing I’ve run into is that we don’t have redundant Internet connections. We can’t put all of our applications running on that. If you rely on technology at all, that’s kind of foolish.”
Our conversation was momentarily interrupted when Plunkett had to address a cooling problem in his server rooms. He’s a busy guy, but he does his best to anticipate hiccups down the road. “It’s just good planning,” he pointed out. His is not a resistance to new technologies, or even to sending his data out into the cloud. His hesitation is simply a resources and availability concern. With three outages in the three years he’s been with the company and only a bonded T line, Plunkett estimates they’d need at least 3 – 4 times their current bandwidth.
He does use some software-as-a-service offerings. “It makes sense for some things to be hosted out,” he said, such as ERI’s website, which shifted to the cloud about a month ago. Plunkett also named AppRiver, an SaaS spam filter, which has helped to cut down on the inflow of potentially dangerous emails, as recognized by his employees. But in a company that only recently invested in a big enough generator to protect against winter-induced outages, cloud security and availability are a major concern.
So what concerns are you harboring about the cloud that are direct results of the size of your business? How do you balance those concerns with the push to go to the cloud? Share your stories in the comments section or send me an email at Melanie@ITKnowledgeExchange.com.
There’s quite the reaction across the blogging community today to a particular article by ComputerWorldUK: Cloud computing is just outsourcing, says Information Security Forum. The article quotes Adrian Davis, principal research analyst at ISF, from his speech at (ISC)2 SecureLondon Conference, including this bit about the insecurity involved in trusting cloud security to providers:
“If you don’t know the classification or sensitivity of information, how do you judge what goes in the cloud and what doesn’t? How does the cloud service provider back up and destroy the information? Is there proof that everything they do happens?” Davis said.
While the issue at hand seems to be that most people disagree with the assumption that cloud services are another form of outsourcing – like David Lacey, who also attended (ISC)2, disagrees in his own IT Security blog – there is another aspect of assumptions and fear-mongering happening here. While I would agree with the caution that Davis is strongly suggesting the enterprise exercise, it seems more users would benefit from being educated on the ways to avoid his seven deadly sins rather than having a finger wagged at them. Mike Vizard blogged about one motivation for raising security concerns related to the cloud:
In face, most of what gets ascribed to security in the cloud are really data management and compliance issues, or simply deliberate attempts to create concern over security as part of an effort to protect jobs that might be threatened by cloud computing.
Is that a fair assessment? Is there simply a lack of understanding surrounding the technology that has spun off into a misunderstanding of security surrounding that technology? How do you respond when you hear negativity toward cloud security: Do you run away or desire to learn more about how to avoid common pitfalls?
Let us know in the comments section or send me an email at Melanie@ITKnowledgeExchange.com.