<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Five fun facts on how IT views business intelligence</title>
	<atom:link href="http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/IT-watch-blog/five-fun-facts-on-how-it-views-business-intelligence/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/IT-watch-blog/five-fun-facts-on-how-it-views-business-intelligence/</link>
	<description>What's new and what matters in IT news, opinion and analysis.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 May 2013 17:37:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: LogiXML in the News &#124; Logi Marketing Tools</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/IT-watch-blog/five-fun-facts-on-how-it-views-business-intelligence/#comment-873</link>
		<dc:creator>LogiXML in the News &#124; Logi Marketing Tools</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Oct 2012 19:25:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/IT-watch-blog/?p=4350#comment-873</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] coverage placements on the LogiXML IT BI survey from Tech Republic and IT Knowledge Exchange (Enterprise IT Watch Blog). As I mentioned in similar emails, this survey shows the huge disconnect that exists between IT [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] coverage placements on the LogiXML IT BI survey from Tech Republic and IT Knowledge Exchange (Enterprise IT Watch Blog). As I mentioned in similar emails, this survey shows the huge disconnect that exists between IT [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: brubensteintt</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/IT-watch-blog/five-fun-facts-on-how-it-views-business-intelligence/#comment-858</link>
		<dc:creator>brubensteintt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Sep 2012 21:39:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/IT-watch-blog/?p=4350#comment-858</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[FYI, got a look at some of the data and updated the post accordingly. It appears that results were counted only from those who answered every question, so the percentages are accurate (there was one addition/transposition error, in the first bullet). I clarified the number of respondents for each individual answer to make it clear how things broke down.&#160;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>FYI, got a look at some of the data and updated the post accordingly. It appears that results were counted only from those who answered every question, so the percentages are accurate (there was one addition/transposition error, in the first bullet). I clarified the number of respondents for each individual answer to make it clear how things broke down.&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: brubensteintt</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/IT-watch-blog/five-fun-facts-on-how-it-views-business-intelligence/#comment-857</link>
		<dc:creator>brubensteintt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Sep 2012 17:42:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/IT-watch-blog/?p=4350#comment-857</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Fair point, Nic. We can try to get a look at the raw data to see if it provides further context (there is some industry data at the end of the report).&#160;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fair point, Nic. We can try to get a look at the raw data to see if it provides further context (there is some industry data at the end of the report).&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NicatDarwin</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/IT-watch-blog/five-fun-facts-on-how-it-views-business-intelligence/#comment-856</link>
		<dc:creator>NicatDarwin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Sep 2012 17:36:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/IT-watch-blog/?p=4350#comment-856</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#039;s really too bad that the survey writers didn&#039;t indicate basic information about the survey. All those lovely graphics! And yet, so meaningless. The authors state that they asked 757 IT professionals across &quot;multiple&quot; industries about how they felt about BI. If I ask 100 people a bunch of questions, I might get 5 people who answer them. If I asked 757, how many people answered? There is no indication how many respondents, which industries (it could make a big difference in how we read the results!), or standard errors (indicating margin of errors and reliability of results). It&#039;s a fun idea to report this, but, ultimately useless. I&#039;d love to have posted a link, but I won&#039;t attach my credibility something lacking any.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s really too bad that the survey writers didn&#8217;t indicate basic information about the survey. All those lovely graphics! And yet, so meaningless. The authors state that they asked 757 IT professionals across &#8220;multiple&#8221; industries about how they felt about BI. If I ask 100 people a bunch of questions, I might get 5 people who answer them. If I asked 757, how many people answered? There is no indication how many respondents, which industries (it could make a big difference in how we read the results!), or standard errors (indicating margin of errors and reliability of results). It&#8217;s a fun idea to report this, but, ultimately useless. I&#8217;d love to have posted a link, but I won&#8217;t attach my credibility something lacking any.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
